严正声明:近期,《海洋技术学报》编辑部发现某些中介组织利用假冒网站、电子信箱、电话等方式,以可以快速刊发稿件为由,向作者提供假冒录用通知并收取费用。对此,我刊发布严正声明,详见动态信息公告。
基于一年逐时潮位的湄洲湾海域潮汐特征与设计水位分析
Analysis of Tidal Characteristics and Design Water Levels in Meizhou Bay Based on One-Year of Hourly Tidal Data
  
DOI:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2029.2026.01.006
中文关键词:  湄洲湾  潮汐  调和分析  累积频率  设计水位
英文关键词:Meizhou Bay  tide  harmonic analysis  cumulative frequency  design water level
基金项目:福建省自然科学基金资助项目(2019J05029)
作者单位
皇甫凯龙1,2 (1. 华北水利水电大学,河南 郑州 4500452.福建省港航勘察设计院有限公司,福建 福州 350002) 
摘要点击次数: 204
全文下载次数: 33
中文摘要:
      基于2023年9月至2024年9月湄洲湾海域4个站位同步逐时观测资料,采用最小二乘原 理的潮汐调和分析法与累积频率法,分析了湄洲湾潮汐特征、变化规律及设计水位特征。结果表明: 湄洲湾近岸海域的潮汐类型为正规半日潮,各站中M2 分潮振幅最为显著,平均振幅为234.0cm, 其中,黄干岛站M2 分潮振幅最小,为227.9cm,秀屿站M2 分潮振幅最大,为241.5cm;M2 分潮 振幅从湄洲湾湾口海域到湾内海域不断增加。S2 分潮振幅和迟角明显小于M2 分潮振幅、迟角,且 S2 分潮振幅和迟角从湄洲湾湾口海域到湾内海域不断增加。湄洲湾海域平均潮差和最大可能潮差最 大值均出现在秀屿站,分别为502cm和903cm;平均潮差和最大可能潮差最小值出现在黄干岛站, 分别为474cm和857cm。湄洲湾海域潮高日不等现象不明显;落潮历时略大于涨潮历时,且涨、落 潮历时相差不超过30min。秀屿站、国投站、东吴站和黄干岛站乘潮1h累积频率为90%时,对应 水位分别为578cm、573cm、569cm和536cm;湄洲湾湾口海域到湾内海域不同频率乘潮水位值 不断增大。秀屿站、国投站、东吴站和黄干岛站设计高水位分别为729cm、722cm、711cm和 678 cm,湄洲湾海域设计高水位从湾内海域到湾口海域不断降低,且降低幅度逐渐增大;设计低水 位分别为77cm、83cm、89cm、61cm,湄洲湾海域设计低水位从湾内海域到湾中海域不断增加, 从湾中海域到湾口海域逐渐降低。
英文摘要:
      Based on the synchronous hourly observational data from four stations within the Meizhou Bay region spanning from September 2023 to September 2024, the tidal harmonic analysis approach founded on the least-squares principle and the cumulative frequency method were employed to conduct an analysis of the fundamental characteristics, variation patterns, and navigable water-level features of the tides in Meizhou Bay. The findings indicate that the tidal regime in the coastal region of Meizhou Bay is characterized by a regular semi-diurnal pattern. Among the monitoring stations, the M2 tidal constituent amplitude is the most pronounced, with an mean amplitude of 234.0 cm. Notably, the amplitude at Huanggan Island Station is the least, measuring 227.9 cm, whereas the amplitude at Xiuyu Station is the largest, reaching 241.5 cm. The amplitude of M2 tidal constituent amplitude increases from the bay entrance towards the interior of Meizhou Bay. Furthermore, the amplitude and phase lag of the S2 tidal constituent are considerably less than those of the M2 tidal constituent, and they similarly escalate from the bay entrance to the interior of Meizhou Bay. The maximum average tidal range and the maximum potential tidal range are both observed at Xiuyu Station, measuring 502 cm and 903 cm respectively. The minimum average tidal range and the maximum potential tidal range are recorded at Huanggan Island Station, with values of 474 cm and 857 cm respectively. The diurnal inequality of tidal height in the Meizhou Bay is not pronounced. The duration of the ebb tide is marginally longer than that of the flood tide, and the disparity between the two does not exceed 30 minutes. The water levels corresponding to a 90% cumulative frequency for 1-hour tidal rise at Xiuyu Station, Guotou Station, Dongwu Station, and Huanggan Island Station are 578 cm, 573 cm, 569 cm, and 536 cm respectively. The water levels corresponding to different frequencies of tidal rise exhibit an increasing trend from the bay entrance towards the inner region of the Meizhou Bay. The designed high water levels at Xiuyu Station, Guotou Station, Dongwu Station, and Huanggan Island Station are 729 cm, 722 cm, 711 cm, and 678 cm respectively. The designed high water-level in the Meizhou Bay decreases from the inner part to the bay mouth, and the decreasing trend gradually increases, possibly due to the convergence of tidal energy caused by the narrowing of the bay爷s topography. The designed low-water levels at Xiuyu Station, Guotou Station, Dongwu Station, and Huanggan Island Station are 77 cm, 83 cm, 89 cm, and 61 cm respectively. In the Meizhou Bay, the designed low-water level increases from the inner part to the middle part of the bay and decreases from the middle part to the bay entrance.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器